The upcoming parliamentary showdown over British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Rwanda plan is reaching its climax, with Sunak set to make a final appeal to peers to support the legislation. Facing weeks of parliamentary debate and numerous amendments, the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill aims to solidify the government's strategy to deter asylum seekers by implementing a one-way journey to Rwanda.
In preparation for crucial votes scheduled for Monday night, Sunak plans to address the media in a press conference, emphasizing the importance of the legislation in his efforts to curb the influx of small boat crossings across the English Channel. Despite facing opposition and amendments from the House of Lords, the government remains resolute in its commitment to pass the Bill, even if it means extending parliamentary sessions into the late hours.
Tensions have escalated as Downing Street rejects the notion of making concessions to appease the Lords, leading to a standoff between the two chambers. The Bill seeks to address objections from the Supreme Court by designating Rwanda as a safe haven for asylum seekers, thereby allowing ministers to bypass emergency injunctions from the European Court of Human Rights.
Sunak has voiced his frustration with the delays, insisting on swift action to push the legislation through. However, recent amendments, including exemptions for Afghan nationals who aided British troops and requirements for independent verification of Rwanda's safety, have further complicated the process.
Monday's proceedings are expected to involve a back-and-forth exchange between the Commons and the Lords, known as "ping pong," as each chamber seeks to assert its amendments. Should the Lords insist on their changes, the Bill may undergo additional rounds of voting, prolonging the debate well beyond the usual parliamentary schedule.
Concerns have been raised regarding the accuracy of designating Rwanda as a safe country, with some labeling the legislation as a "post-truth Bill." Crossbench peer Lord Anderson has highlighted the potential consequences of passing such a declaration, questioning the validity of declaring Rwanda safe amidst ongoing concerns about human rights violations.
As the parliamentary showdown looms, the fate of the Rwanda plan hangs in the balance, with both sides steadfast in their positions, and the outcome uncertain.
Read also | Iranian President Raisi's Silence on Kashmir Leaves Pakistani PM Disappointed
