The Supreme Court rejected former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia's review plea regarding the denial of bail in the alleged liquor policy scam case. Justices Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti dismissed the plea without an oral hearing, stating that there were no grounds for a review of their October 30 judgment.
Typically, review petitions under Article 137 of the Constitution focus on specific legal errors or clear mistakes in the records. Earlier, the court had refused bail to Sisodia, citing established aspects concerning a transfer of Rs 338 crore amid pending inquiries.
While directing completion of Sisodia's trial within six to eight months, the court indicated a chance for fresh bail application if the trial's pace remained slow in the subsequent three months. Sisodia, facing corruption and money laundering charges, was initially arrested by the CBI in February and later by the ED in March. The Supreme Court's decision solidifies the denial of bail, emphasizing the need for a swift trial.
Key Points:
1. The Supreme Court rejected the review plea by Manish Sisodia, former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister, seeking bail in the alleged liquor policy scam case.
2. Justices Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti dismissed the plea, stating that there were no grounds for reviewing their earlier judgment dated October 30, 2023.
3. The bench declined an oral hearing and decided to dismiss the plea without further discussion.
4. Review petitions under Article 137 of the Constitution are usually considered on specific grounds like legal errors or obvious mistakes in records.
5. Earlier, on October 30, the Supreme Court had denied bail to Sisodia, citing some established aspects related to the transfer of Rs 338 crore amidst corruption and money laundering charges.
6. Despite unanswered questions, the court ordered Sisodia's trial to conclude within six to eight months and suggested reapplying for bail if the trial progresses slowly in the subsequent three months.
7. Sisodia was initially arrested by the CBI on February 26 and later by the ED on March 9 in connection to the case.
8. The Supreme Court's rejection of the bail plea upholds the earlier decision and directives regarding the completion of the trial within a specified time frame.
9. The focus remains on the specific aspects of the case, with the court emphasizing the need for a timely and conclusive trial.
10. The dismissed review plea signifies the continuation of legal proceedings against Sisodia in the alleged scam case, maintaining the urgency for a swift and fair trial.
(With Agency Inputs)
ALSO READ | AAP Leader Manish Sisodia Meets Ailing Spouse Amidst Police Custody
