Former US President Donald Trump received a welcome relief on Wednesday as the Michigan Supreme Court rejected an attempt to exclude him from the 2024 primary ballot based on the US Constitution's "insurrectionist ban." This decision provides a temporary reprieve and victory for Trump, although the possibility of renewed efforts to remove him during the general election remains.
In contrast to Michigan's decision, the Colorado Supreme Court recently ruled to remove Trump from its primary ballot due to his alleged involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot. This decision has been temporarily halted until January 2 pending an appeal.
The divergent rulings between Michigan and Colorado add complexity to Trump's appeal before the US Supreme Court against the Colorado judgment. The outcome of this appeal holds significant implications for Trump's electoral prospects in the 2024 presidential race.
Notably, the Michigan lawsuit did not progress to a trial and was dismissed early on. An intermediate appeals court supported the decision to dismiss the case on procedural grounds. In September, the lawsuit was filed by advocacy organization Free Speech For People on behalf of a group of voters.
In contrast, the Colorado lawsuit, initiated by a separate liberal-leaning group, awaits further legal proceedings. The contrasting legal outcomes in these states contribute to the intricacy of Trump's legal battles as he navigates challenges to his candidacy.
(With Agency Inputs)
Read also| Trump risks losing all if he focuses on 2020 'stolen election' theatrics
Read also| Trump Seeks Supreme Court Delay for 2024 Eligibility Verdict
