Allahabad High Court

The application highlights visible Hindu symbols in the mosque, such as a lotus-shaped pillar and an image of Sheshnaag, a deity linked to Lord Krishna, justifying the need for a commission. The suit seeks a declaration that the disputed land, including the Shahi Idgah Mosque area, belongs to Lord Shree Krishna Virajman, and requests the removal of the mosque by the defendants, including the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board.

The husband was convicted under sections related to cruelty and voluntarily causing hurt, while charges under Section 377 were acquitted. The Supreme Court has agreed to list pleas to criminalize marital rape, with the government expressing concerns about potential social ramifications.

Disposing of a joint petition filed by inter-religious live-in couple, Justice Surendra Singh-1 directed that in case any disturbance is caused in the peaceful living of the petitioners, the petitioners shall approach the superintendent of police concerned, with a copy of this order, who shall provide immediate protection to the petitioners.

“The communication between the mobile phones of two accused persons when recorded on a digital voice recorder after putting the call on speaker will not amount to interception,” the bench said.

The matter will now be heard at 3.30 p.m. on Thursday. A bench of Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker passed the order while hearing the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee's challenge to the Varanasi district judge's July 21 order for an ASI survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque.

The Hindu worshippers requested permission for daily worship of Hindu deities in the Gyanvapi mosque. The high court has rejected the mosque committee's challenge to the 5 Hindu women worshippers' suit pending before the Varanasi court. Last year in December, the bench of Justice J.J. Munir reserved its judgment after hearing counsel for both parties at length.

The new Chief Justices are Justice Pritinker Diwaker of the Allahabad High Court, Justice Ramesh Sinha of the Chhattisgarh High Court, and Justice K. Vinod Chandran of the Patna High Court. Law Minister Kiren Rijiju, in a tweet, said: "In exercise of the power conferred by the Constitution of India, the President of India has appointed.

In this major judgment, the court quashed the first information report, which was lodged by the father of a girl in Uttar Pradesh's Jaunpur district. A division bench of Allahabad HC comprising Justice Suneet Kumar and Justice Syed Waiz Mian relied upon a judgment of the apex court which provided that live-in relationship between the consenting adults is legal if the requirements of marriage, such as legal age of marriage, consent and soundness of mind, are met. No rule permits or bans such connections, the apex court had added.