BJP National President and Leader of the House in the Rajya Sabha, JP Nadda, initiated a debate in the Upper House of Parliament, highlighting the significance of the Indian Constitution. He criticised the period of Emergency and invited the Congress party to join in commemorating an ‘Anti-Democracy Day’ if they truly regret that era.
"We all know India is the largest democracy, but as PM Modi said, it is not only the largest democracy but the mother of democracy, and that we should understand," Nadda remarked.
Reaching to the debates in Constituent Assembly, Nadda brought to notice how Indian culture and history played a prime role.
He said, "When we look at Constituent Assembly debates, we find India's culture, history, and Indian ethos deeply embedded. Indian ethos encompasses democracy, comprising freedom, acceptability, equality, and inclusivity in society, allowing common citizens to lead a quality and dignified life. This thought was deeply ingrained in the minds of the Constituent Assembly members."
Touching upon ancient scriptures like the Rig Veda and Atharvaveda, the party chief underlined that ideas of meetings, discussions, and deliberations were considered while framing the Constitution, with India's heritage in mind.
Nadda further attacked the Congress by saying that the party delayed to acknowledge leaders like Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and, after so many years, mentioned the name of the Iron Man of India.
He said, "Sardar Patel integrated 562 princely states, but one — Jammu & Kashmir —was left to then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. An extraordinary provision was introduced, and Sheikh Abdullah was involved in Kashmir matters. Nehru asked Abdullah to consult B.R Ambedkar, but Ambedkar refused, stating, 'To give consent to this proposal would be a treacherous thing to do,' referring to Article 370.
He remembered how Syama Prasad Mookerjee opposed Article 370, famously declaring, "In one country, two constitutions won't be followed."
Mookerjee's death in prison, and his mother's plea to PM Nehru for justice, were also dismissed, Nadda added.
Nadda criticized the imposition of Article 35A through a Presidential Order, bypassing parliamentary debate. "Article 35A defined state citizenship in J&K, allowing only those who resided before 1944 to be citizens, excluding refugees from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Women faced discrimination, if a Kashmiri girl married a non-Kashmiri, she lost her property rights."
He enumerated a host of major acts that are not implemented in J&K under Article 370, such as protections from human rights violations, POSCO Act, and safety of women's act.
He stated that the amendments, supported by Congress, like 73rd and 74th Constitutional Acts, which guaranteed grass root democracy were not implemented in J&K. "Reservation for Scheduled Tribes like Gujjar and Bakarwal communities was also denied," he added.
He criticized the plight of workers brought to J&K for cleaning jobs, saying, "They were promised citizenship but remained cleaning workers, with no rights for their children to secure other positions or reservations."
Nadda hailed the Narendra Modi government for abrogating Article 370 on August 5, 2019, making J&K an "indivisible part of India.
"I remember people sitting in protest against a law that caused such harm. I thank PM Modi because, under his guidance and strategy, we have rectified this," Nadda asserted.
Speaking on Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge's statements related to the Emergency, Nadda said that it was wrong on part of the Congress party to impose Emergency in 1975.
He said, "The Emergency was not imposed because the nation was in danger, but because the chair and power were in danger. Congress must reflect on this dark period. On June 25, 2025, we will mark 50 years of that 'black period' of democracy. I call upon the Congress to join us in observing 'Anti-Democracy Day' and raise their voices against what happened. If you have any respect or regret, come and join us.
Read also| Bengal Minister Faces Intra-Party Criticism Over 'Muslim Majority' Remarks
Read also| Savarkar's Great-Grandson Responds to Rahul Gandhi on Who Truly 'Compromised'
