Amazon Vs Future Retail: SC rules in favour of Amazon; emergency award enforceable in Indian law

A bench headed by justice R.F. Nariman held that the emergency award passed under the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) rules can be enforced in India under Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The top court said: "Emergency arbitrator's award holds good under section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and single judge's order for such award cannot be appealed under Section 17(2)".

In a major victory for Amazon, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled in the favour of e-commerce giant in its dispute with Future Retail. The top court held that the emergency arbitrator award is enforceable in Indian law.

A bench headed by justice R.F. Nariman held that the emergency award passed under the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) rules can be enforced in India under Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Advertisement

The top court said: "Emergency arbitrator's award holds good under section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and single judge's order for such award cannot be appealed under Section 17(2)".

Also Read | Amazon shares fall even after posting over $100bn sales in Q2

Advertisement

On July 29, the Supreme Court had reserved the judgment on the pleas of e-commerce giant Amazon challenging the Rs 24,713 crore deal for merger of Future Retail Ltd (FRL) with Reliance Retail.

Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC and FRL have been locked in a bitter legal battle over the deal.

Advertisement

Amazon had argued that the Singapore's Emergency Arbitrator (EA) award, which restrained FRL from going ahead with the merger, was valid and enforceable. Amazon had moved the apex court challenging the Delhi High Court's division bench order which gave a green signal to the Reliance-FRL deal.

Also Read |  Amazon may soon allow digital currency as payment mode

Advertisement

Senior advocate Harish Salve, representing FRL, had contended there was no notion of EA under the Indian law on arbitration and conciliation and also, there was no arbitration agreement to this effect. Salve emphasized that there was no provision for EA under the Indian law.

On February 8, a Division Bench had stayed the single-judge direction to FRL and various statutory authorities to maintain the status quo on the deal.

Advertisement

 

Advertisement