India head coach Gautam Gambhir has demanded a big change in the rules of Test cricket, requesting injury substitutes during games in instances of serious outside injuries.
The remarks were made after the fourth Test in Manchester, when wicket-keeper batter Rishabh Pant got a broken foot but still came back to bat heroically.
Pant had retired injured on the first day of the drawn Test but showed courage to continue his innings the next day, scoring a gritty half-century despite the fracture. India were allowed to utilize Dhruv Jurel as a substitute behind the wickets, but according to current regulations, he could not bat during the second innings.
Gambhir, moved by Pant’s resilience, suggested that players in such evident distress should be replaced without penalty, provided match officials confirm the injury's severity.
Any praise given to him is not sufficient. Absolutely, I'm all in favor of it. If the umpires and the match referee notices and senses that it is a serious injury, then I feel it's very imperative. It's very imperative to have this rule where you can get a substitute, i.e., if it's (the injury) very prominent," Gambhir said in the post-match press conference.
He highlighted how important such a rule would be, particularly in closely fought series. "There's nothing wrong in doing that, particularly in a series like this where it's been such a closely contested series in the last three Test matches. Imagine if we would've played with 10 men against 11. How unlucky would this be for us?" he further added.
Under the present ICC playing conditions, the only two exceptions which allow replacements are for concussions and cases of COVID-19 during a match.
But England captain Ben Stokes reacted strongly against Gambhir's argument, terming the proposal "ridiculous" and warning that any such rule would be prone to manipulation.
"I believe it is completely ridiculous that there is discussion over an injury replacement. I believe there would simply be too many loopholes for teams to be able to navigate. You choose your 11 to play a game; injuries are a part of the game. I fully comprehend the concussion replacement: player welfare and player safety," Stokes added.
Employing sarcasm to identify the abuse potential, Stokes supplemented: "If you put me in an MRI machine, I can get somebody else in immediately. If you put anybody else with an MRI machine, a bowler will say, 'Oh yeah, you've got inflammation around your knee. Oh sweet, we can get another fresh bowler in'. I just think that exchange should be cut out and ended."
The controversy now raises the larger question in cricket's changing world: must player safety unlock strategic freedom, or must tradition and integrity limit injury replacements to the minimum? As the discussion rages on, cricket's rule-makers might have to face this new grey area.
Read also| Root's 150 and Stokes' Unbeaten 77 Power England to 186-Run Lead Over India in 4th Test
