The Supreme Court suspended BSP leader Afzal Ansari's conviction in a Gangsters Act case, potentially restoring his Lok Sabha membership. Initially disqualified in May due to a four-year imprisonment, the court ruled that Ansari won't participate or vote in Parliament but can contest future elections pending the appeal's outcome in the Allahabad High Court.
Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan's majority opinion outlined this, setting a High Court appeal deadline before June 30, 2024. However, Justice Dipankar Datta's minority view declined to restore Ansari's Parliament membership, aligning with the Allahabad High Court's decision granting bail but not staying the conviction.
The UP government argued against suspending the conviction as a routine measure. Ansari's appeal emphasized his acquittal in BJP MLA Krishnanand Rai's murder case, while the High Court has sought sentence enhancement in the Gangsters Act case.
Key Points:
1. The Supreme Court suspended the conviction of BSP leader Afzal Ansari in a Gangsters Act case, allowing for the potential restoration of his Lok Sabha membership.
2. Previously disqualified as an MP due to a four-year imprisonment sentence and a Rs 1 lakh fine in the case, Ansari's suspension of conviction doesn't grant him participation in House proceedings, voting rights, or parliamentary benefits.
3. However, he retains eligibility to contest future elections, pending the outcome of his appeal before the Allahabad High Court, which is expected to conclude by June 30, 2024.
4. Justice Dipankar Datta's minority opinion refused to intervene in the Allahabad High Court's decision granting bail to Afzal Ansari but not restoring his parliamentary membership despite his release from jail.
5. Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj, representing the UP government, argued against the routine granting of suspension of conviction, advocating it as an exception rather than a norm.
6. Ansari's appeal contends that the Gangsters Act charge stemmed from alleged involvement in the murder of BJP MLA Krishnanand Rai, for which he was acquitted. However, the Uttar Pradesh government has sought an enhancement of his sentence in this case.
7. Despite his release from prison due to bail, the suspension of his conviction is distinct from reinstating his parliamentary membership, creating a legal debate over the restoration of his rights as an MP.
8. The Supreme Court's ruling outlines specific limitations on Ansari's parliamentary privileges, emphasizing his exclusion from active participation in parliamentary proceedings and benefits.
9. The appeal pending before the Allahabad High Court determines the future course of Ansari's parliamentary status, subject to the court's decision on his conviction.
10. The case's complexities involve legal interpretations around the suspension of conviction, implications for parliamentary membership, and the pending appeal's significance in shaping Afzal Ansari's political future.
(With Agency Inputs)
ALSO READ | Mayawati Takes Action: Expels Danish Ali from BSP for Alleged Anti-Party Activities
ALSO READ | Mafia don Brijesh Singh to contest on SBSP ticket in 2024
