Consumer Court Orders Maruti to Replace Damaged Grand Vitara, Rules in Owner's Favour in E20 Case

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ordered Maruti Suzuki to replace a Grand Vitara Strong Hybrid or compensate the owner if a replacement is not provided within 45 days.

A consumer court in Raipur has delivered a ruling in favour of a vehicle owner in what is being regarded as India's first known consumer dispute involving E20 petrol. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ordered Maruti Suzuki to replace a Grand Vitara Strong Hybrid or compensate the owner if a replacement is not provided within 45 days.

 
The case was brought by Raipur resident Dr. Premraj Debta, who alleged that his Grand Vitara Strong Hybrid Zeta+ developed recurring technical issues soon after it was purchased. Court records stated that the SUV was bought in June 2024 despite having been manufactured in January 2023. Within five months of the purchase, the vehicle reportedly began stalling repeatedly.
 
According to the complaint, the SUV was taken to authorised service centres on several occasions, where technicians cleaned the fuel tank after contamination was detected. Dr. Debta claimed the fault resurfaced even after the repairs. He further stated that fuel samples examined by a government-recognised laboratory revealed the presence of a white, curd-like substance identified as ethanol. The complainant also argued that he had not been informed at the time of purchase that the vehicle was not fully compatible with E20 petrol.
 
After considering submissions from both parties and examining the evidence on record, the Commission concluded that repeated servicing had failed to eliminate the defect. It observed that the same problem continued to occur despite multiple repair attempts, lending support to the consumer's claims.
 
The Commission also took note of the limited fuel options available to motorists. It observed that E20 petrol had become the standard fuel available at petrol stations, leaving consumers with little practical choice. In its assessment, drivers could not reasonably be expected to avoid using E20 fuel when alternatives were not readily available.
 
Maruti Suzuki and the dealership argued that the Grand Vitara was compatible with E20 petrol and maintained that the reported issues resulted from routine wear, maintenance-related factors or other unrelated reasons. The Commission, however, did not accept those arguments.
 
The order directs Maruti Suzuki and the dealer to provide the owner with a new E20-compatible vehicle within 45 days. Failing that, they have been instructed to refund Rs 20.50 lakh, covering the cost of the SUV along with RTO charges and the insurance premium.
 
The Commission also awarded Dr. Debta Rs 1 lakh as compensation for mental harassment and Rs 10,000 towards litigation expenses. It further stated that interest would be payable if the compensation is not released within the prescribed period.
 

Advertisement